Protein source
CautionIngredient list unavailable
Top-3 or full ingredient information is too limited.
Foods with limited ingredient disclosure stay unconfirmed.
Public ReviewGrade DKibble (Extruded)Manufacturing: Kibble (Extruded)
Solid Gold
Solid Gold Barking at the Moon Beef & Egg Grain-Free
1.0★Public ScoreManufacturer-independentPublic-data basedIngredients · nutrition · safety
Key points
Ingredient guide
Included support ingredients
Nutrient guideFew disclosed functional support ingredients
Caution
Ingredient grade
D
Grade D
Top ingredient profile
No plant booster
Crude protein-
Crude protein-
Crude fat-
Other 100%
Protein position, fat position, and calorie density position are relative to foods in the same processing type cohort.
biotechProtein position
Limitedquery_statsFat position
Limitedlocal_fire_departmentCalorie density
LimitedPublic evidence is still thin, so this remains an early comparison read.
There is enough public data to keep this food in comparison, but the top ingredient structure does not support a stronger positive claim yet.
What still needs work
- Public nutrient disclosure is still thin, so deeper comparison remains limited.
Brand context
Brand background availableRecall history confirmed
Founded in 1974 in the United States. This brand has a confirmed recall history, including the 2012 Diamond-manufactured recall.
Ingredient analysis
This section matters more than usual because the ingredient read is not strong enough to summarize in one line.
restaurantIngredient Quality Analysis
Ingredient Grade
Conservative
Ingredient Analysis Comments
restaurantIngredient Grade DConservative
Why did the base review land here?
Ingredient qualityNutrient disclosure levelManufacturing & trust
This review score combines ingredient composition, nutrient disclosure, manufacturing trust, and core nutrient caution signals.
Nutrient disclosure
Limited disclosure
This section is more about what is still undisclosed than about reading a complete nutrient story.
Safety verification
No fails
No major red flag jumps out first, though undisclosed rows still define the limits of this safety read.
Public data trust (ETF)
D tier
Only basic guaranteed analysis is visible, so deeper nutrition comparison stays hard to trust.
Where it sits in the same processing cohort
Kibble (Extruded) cohortCompare-first
Within the Kibble (Extruded) cohort, this recipe sits in the compare-first band.
Final word
Treat this review as an early screen. If the food stays interesting, verify it again with your dog-specific context before acting.
What to compare next
Criteria to compare with this food
These criteria come from the product name, brand, veterinary purpose, and disclosed nutrients, so you can compare similar foods after reading the review.
Brand analysis
Royal Canin dog food analysis: veterinary diets, breed lines, and label checks
Royal Canin spans veterinary, breed, and daily lines, so product purpose matters first.
Heart criteriaBest dog food for heart disease: sodium, taurine, L-carnitine, omega-3, and DCM context
Heart context should connect sodium, taurine, L-carnitine, and omega-3 disclosure.
Allergy criteriaBest dog food for dogs with allergies: protein history, hydrolyzed diets, and label checks
Allergy context depends on protein history, hydrolyzed formulas, and limited ingredients.
Joint criteriaBest dog food for joint support: weight control, EPA/DHA, glucosamine, and mobility checks
Joint context should connect weight control, EPA+DHA, and disclosed support ingredients.
Label basicsBest dog food criteria: ingredients, calories, disclosure, and health context
Before the brand claim, compare top ingredients, guaranteed analysis, kcal/kg, and disclosure.