Back to all foods/Royal Canin
Public ReviewGrade DKibble (Extruded)Manufacturing: Kibble (Extruded)

Royal Canin

Royal Canin Canine Renal Support A

Prescription purpose: renal supportNot a standard star comparisonManufacturer-independentPublic-data basedIngredients · nutrition · safety

Key points

Protein source

Moderate caution

Processed plant protein after the top 3

Top 3: Rice, Maize Flour, Animal Fat

Detected: Maize Gluten

The protein number includes processed plant protein support.

Even when it appears later, the protein number is read more conservatively.

Ingredient guide

Included support ingredients

Nutrient guide
renal support markersPhosphorus 0.2%Sodium 0.2%Potassium 0.7%Crude Protein 16%
Fish oilSkin and joint support ingredientFOSGut support ingredientOmega-3Skin and joint support ingredientOmega-6Skin and coat support ingredientEPA+DHASkin, joint, and heart support ingredientTaurineHeart support ingredientVitamin EAntioxidant and skin support ingredient
Caution

Ingredient grade

D

Grade D

Top ingredient profile

Rice
Maize Flour
Animal Fat
Plant booster present
Crude protein16%
Crude protein16%
Crude fat18%
Other 66%

Protein position, fat position, and calorie density position are relative to foods in the same processing type cohort.

biotechProtein position
Lower
query_statsFat position
Higher
local_fire_departmentCalorie density
Higher

This is a prescription diet for renal support, so purpose fit comes before standard star ranking.

This is a prescription-diet candidate for renal support. Read purpose fit and veterinary guidance before treating it as a standard star-ranked food.

Nutritional strengths

  • Crude Protein, Phosphorus, Sodium, Potassium are disclosed, so phosphorus, sodium, and electrolyte-management context can be reviewed.
  • Top ingredients do not show a prominent FDA-investigated non-hereditary DCM ingredient profile.

What still needs work

  • Refined carbohydrates lose fiber, vitamins, and minerals during processing, and mainly act as starch and energy sources. Because of that, our engine reads ingredient quality more conservatively than it would with whole grains.
  • Processed plant protein appears after the top 3, so some protein support is still built into the label number.
  • Calcium:Phosphorus Ratio sits near the upper end of the preferred range, so a more conservative read makes sense.

Brand context

Brand background availableRecall history confirmed

Founded in 1968 in France. This brand has a confirmed public recall history, with a recent 2023 mislabeling case in public sources.

Ingredient analysis

This section matters more than usual because the ingredient read is not strong enough to summarize in one line.

restaurantIngredient Quality Analysis

D1.5/6
Ingredient Grade
Conservative
1Rice
Refined Carb · Mid
2Maize Flour
Refined Carb · Mid
3Animal Fat
Generic Fat · Mid

Ingredient Analysis Comments

  • Rice is a refined carbohydrate source. It usually reads as a starch and energy source rather than a protein driver. It reads as an mid-tier carb source.
  • Maize Flour is a refined carbohydrate source. It usually reads as a starch and energy source rather than a protein driver. It reads as an mid-tier carb source.
  • Animal Fat is a generic fat source. It supports calories, but transparency is weaker than a named oil or fat. It reads as an mid-tier fat source.
restaurantIngredient Grade DConservative

Full collected ingredient list

15 ingredients
RiceMaize FlourAnimal FatMaize GlutenSoy Protein IsolateHydrolyzed Animal ProteinBeet PulpMineralsEgg PowderPlant FiberFish OilSoybean OilFructooligosaccharides (FOS)Green Tea Extract (source of Polyphenols)Marigold Extract (source of Lutein)
Primary positive ingredients
Support positive ingredients
Neutral ingredients
Caution ingredients
High-caution ingredients

Why processed plant proteins are reviewed cautiously

Ingredient lists are ordered by input weight, not protein contribution. Fresh meat 100g and Soybean Meal 50g can both contribute about 20g of protein, and Pea Protein can deliver a similar amount at around 30g. So these ingredients can materially lift crude protein even outside the top three. The review treats processed plant-protein boosters cautiously because they can weaken the animal-protein-centered profile most guardians expect from a high-protein food.

Why did the base review land here?

Ingredient qualityNutrient disclosure levelManufacturing & trust

This review score combines ingredient composition, nutrient disclosure, manufacturing trust, and core nutrient caution signals.

Nutrient disclosure

Partial disclosure

Core guaranteed analysis is usable, but deeper rows still need a more cautious read.

Safety verification

1 warnings

There is no immediate hard stop here, but a few caution rows are still worth checking.

Public data trust (ETF)

C1 tier

There is a usable disclosure baseline, but the public record is still fairly thin.

Where it sits in the same processing cohort

Kibble (Extruded) cohortCompare-first

Within the Kibble (Extruded) cohort, this recipe sits in the compare-first band.

Final word

Treat this review as an early screen. If the food stays interesting, verify it again with your dog-specific context before acting.

Back to all foods