Label analysisGrade DKibble (Extruded)

JalmukJalsa

JalmukJalsa 6Free Salmon

Editor ingredient insight

JalmukJalsa 6Free Salmon leads with poultry meal, rice, and wheat, so it is neither salmon-led nor grain-free despite its name. Hydrolyzed salmon appears later and pea protein is also present. At 26% protein and 11% fat it is not especially rich, but kcal/kg is undisclosed; dogs avoiding chicken, wheat, peas, or seeking a salmon-only trial should look elsewhere.

Logic-based verdict

This food can stay in comparison, but ingredient quality still needs a more conservative read.

Manufacturer-independentPublic-data basedIngredients · nutrition · safety

Protein source

Ingredient guide

Unclear animal protein source

Animal protein

Hydrolyzed Salmon (#17)

Animal-based does not always mean clearly sourced.

Unspecified animal protein is read conservatively.

Caution

Ingredient grade

D

Grade D

Top ingredient profile

Rice
Lower transparency leadPlant booster present
Crude protein26%
Crude protein26%
Crude fat11%
Other 63%

Calcium

1%

Phosphorus

0.9%

Protein position, fat position, and calorie density position are relative to foods in the same processing type cohort.

biotechProtein position
Typical
query_statsFat position
Lower
local_fire_departmentCalorie density
Limited

There is enough public data to keep this food in comparison, but the top ingredient structure does not support a stronger positive claim yet.

What works well in this food

  • Crude protein does not drop into a clearly low band.
  • Top ingredients do not show a prominent FDA-investigated non-hereditary DCM ingredient profile.

Check before feeding

  • Refined carbohydrates lose fiber, vitamins, and minerals during processing, and mainly act as starch and energy sources. Because of that, our engine reads ingredient quality more conservatively than it would with whole grains.
  • Plant proteins can lift crude protein on the label, but the real animal-protein share still needs a closer check.
  • Less specific rendered animal ingredients sit high in the recipe, so ingredient quality still needs a more cautious read.

Smart beef alternatives

Brand context

Brand context limitedRecall research scope limited

The currently searched public sources are not enough to make a confident recall or withdrawal call for this brand.

Ingredient analysis

This section matters more than usual because the ingredient read is not strong enough to summarize in one line.

restaurantIngredient Quality Analysis

D1.5/6
Ingredient Grade
Conservative
1계육분
Generic Meal · Lower
2Rice
Refined Carb · Mid
3소맥
Other · Mid

Ingredient Analysis Comments

  • •계육분 is a generic rendered protein source. Protein may be concentrated, but the animal source is not specific. It reads as an lower-tier protein source.
  • •Rice is a refined carbohydrate source. It usually reads as a starch and energy source rather than a protein driver. It reads as an mid-tier carb source.
  • •소맥 is disclosed, but its role is not explicit enough to count as a strong quality signal. It reads as an mid-tier ingredient.
restaurantIngredient Grade DConservative

Full collected ingredient list

28 ingredients
계육분Rice소맥CornOilseed MealsBeet Pulp레시틴계유수지박강피류효모완두단백질(닭가수분해향미제)해조류Choline Chloride제일인산칼슘FructooligosaccharidesHydrolyzed Salmon아미노산Minerals루테인콜라겐가수분해간천연토코페롤유산균비타민류합제(비타민A, 비타민B1 등)정제소금혼합광물질류합제(구리, 아연 등)Yucca Extract
Primary positive ingredients
Support positive ingredients
Alternative protein
Neutral ingredients
Caution ingredients
High-caution ingredients

Why processed plant proteins are reviewed cautiously

Ingredient lists are ordered by input weight, not protein contribution. Fresh meat 100g and Soybean Meal 50g can both contribute about 20g of protein, and Pea Protein can deliver a similar amount at around 30g. So these ingredients can materially lift crude protein even outside the top three. The review treats processed plant-protein boosters cautiously because they can weaken the animal-protein-centered profile most guardians expect from a high-protein food.

Why did the base review land here?

Ingredient qualityNutrient disclosure levelManufacturing & trust

This review score combines ingredient composition, nutrient disclosure, manufacturing trust, and core nutrient caution signals.

Nutrient disclosure

Partial disclosure

Core guaranteed analysis is usable, but deeper rows still need a more cautious read.

Safety verification

No fails

No major red flag jumps out first, though undisclosed rows still define the limits of this safety read.

Final word

Treat this review as an early screen. If the food stays interesting, verify it again with your dog-specific context before acting.

Back to all foods