Hill's
Key points
Protein source
CautionWhole plant source plus processed protein support
Top 3: Chicken, Yellow Peas, Potatoes
The top-3 whole plant source is a possibility signal, while the later processed plant protein is a clear protein-support signal.
Because both possible and clear plant-protein signals appear, the protein number is read conservatively.
Included support ingredients
Nutrient guideIngredient grade
Grade C
Top ingredient profile
Protein position, fat position, and calorie density position are relative to foods in the same processing type cohort.
There is enough public data to keep this food in comparison, but the top ingredient structure does not support a stronger positive claim yet.
Nutritional strengths
What still needs work
Founded in 1907 in the United States. This brand has a confirmed recall history. The most recent public recall noted here was the 2019 vitamin D incident.
The top ingredients are still usable, but this is the part to inspect more carefully before calling the recipe a clear strength.
Why processed plant proteins are reviewed cautiously
Ingredient lists are ordered by input weight, not protein contribution. Fresh meat 100g and Soybean Meal 50g can both contribute about 20g of protein, and Pea Protein can deliver a similar amount at around 30g. So these ingredients can materially lift crude protein even outside the top three. The review treats processed plant-protein boosters cautiously because they can weaken the animal-protein-centered profile most guardians expect from a high-protein food.
This review score combines ingredient composition, nutrient disclosure, manufacturing trust, and core nutrient caution signals.
Core guaranteed analysis is usable, but deeper rows still need a more cautious read.
No major red flag jumps out first, though undisclosed rows still define the limits of this safety read.
There is a usable disclosure baseline, but the public record is still fairly thin.
Within the Kibble (Extruded) cohort, this recipe sits in the upper middle band.
Final word
There is enough here to keep the food in comparison, but not enough to stop comparing yet.
What to compare next
These criteria come from the product name, brand, veterinary purpose, and disclosed nutrients, so you can compare similar foods after reading the review.
Royal Canin spans veterinary, breed, and daily lines, so product purpose matters first.
Heart criteriaHeart context should connect sodium, taurine, L-carnitine, and omega-3 disclosure.
Allergy criteriaAllergy context depends on protein history, hydrolyzed formulas, and limited ingredients.
Joint criteriaJoint context should connect weight control, EPA+DHA, and disclosed support ingredients.
Label basicsBefore the brand claim, compare top ingredients, guaranteed analysis, kcal/kg, and disclosure.