Back to all foods/Grandma Lucy's
Public ReviewGrade CFreeze-DriedManufacturing: Freeze-Dried

Grandma Lucy's

Grandma Lucy's Artisan Chicken

3.0★Public ScoreManufacturer-independentPublic-data basedIngredients · nutrition · safety

Key points

Protein source

Unconfirmed

Protein source read held

Top 3: Chicken, Potatoes, Flax

This structure does not cleanly land as either a strong positive or caution signal.

Check the full ingredient list and ingredient analysis below.

Ingredient guide

Included support ingredients

Nutrient guide
CranberryUrinary support ingredient
Solid build

Ingredient grade

B

Grade B

Top ingredient profile

Chicken
Potatoes
Flax
Fresh-meat leadNo plant booster
Crude protein26%
Crude protein26%
Crude fat13%
Other 61%

Protein position, fat position, and calorie density position are relative to foods in the same processing type cohort.

biotechProtein position
Lower
query_statsFat position
Lower
local_fire_departmentCalorie density
Lower

This food can stay in comparison, but ingredient quality still needs a more conservative read.

There is enough public data to keep this food in comparison, but the top ingredient structure does not support a stronger positive claim yet.

Nutritional strengths

  • supportive seed ingredients are included, so the recipe also looks at fat composition rather than protein alone.
  • The first ingredient is a species-named fresh meat.
  • Calorie density is on the lower side.
  • Top ingredients do not show a prominent FDA-investigated non-hereditary DCM ingredient profile.

What still needs work

  • Phosphorus is 1% on the label, at or above 1%. Senior dogs or dogs with kidney concerns should have phosphorus restriction reviewed with a veterinarian before using it as a staple food.
  • The first ingredient is a species-named fresh meat, but refined grain or starch follows immediately after it, so ingredient quality needs a more conservative read.
  • Price per kilogram runs on the higher side, so budget can change the shortlist order.

Brand context

Brand background availableRecall research scope limited

Founded in 1999 in the United States. The currently searched public sources are not enough to make a confident recall or withdrawal call for this brand.

Ingredient analysis

The top ingredients give this recipe a strong first protein read, so the ingredient section starts from a favorable position.

restaurantIngredient Quality Analysis

B4.5/6
Ingredient Grade
Good
1Chicken
Fresh Meat · Top
2Potatoes
Starchy Tuber · Mid
3Flax
Seed/Oil Support · Upper

Ingredient Analysis Comments

  • •Chicken is a named fresh meat ingredient. The animal source is clearly identified. It reads as an top-tier protein source.
  • •Potatoes is a starchy tuber ingredient. It is not a grain, but it still reads mainly as a starch and energy source. It reads as an mid-tier carb source.
  • •Flax reads as a seed or supportive oil ingredient. It supports fat composition more than it drives protein quality. It reads as an upper-tier fat source.
restaurantIngredient Grade BGood

Full collected ingredient list

25 ingredients
ChickenPotatoesFlaxCarrotsCeleryApplesBlueberriesCranberriesGarlicVitamin A SupplementVitamin D3 SupplementVitamin E SupplementNiacin SupplementIron ProteinateCalcium CarbonatePhosphorousZinc ProteinateRiboflavin SupplementThiamine MononitratePotassium ChlorideManganese ProteinateCopper ProteinateMagnesium ChloridePyridoxine HydrochlorideVitamin B12 Supplement
Primary positive ingredients
Support positive ingredients
Neutral ingredients
Caution ingredients
High-caution ingredients

Why did the base review land here?

Ingredient qualityNutrient disclosure levelManufacturing & trust

This review score combines ingredient composition, nutrient disclosure, manufacturing trust, and core nutrient caution signals.

Nutrient disclosure

Partial disclosure

Core guaranteed analysis is usable, but deeper rows still need a more cautious read.

Safety verification

No fails

No major red flag jumps out first, though undisclosed rows still define the limits of this safety read.

Public data trust (ETF)

C1 tier

Recipe-level variation is disclosed, but recency and validation breadth are still limited.

Where it sits in the same processing cohort

Freeze-Dried cohortCompare-first

Within the Freeze-Dried cohort, this recipe sits in the compare-first band.

Final word

There is enough here to keep the food in comparison, but not enough to stop comparing yet.

Back to all foods

What to compare next

Criteria to compare with this food

These criteria come from the product name, brand, veterinary purpose, and disclosed nutrients, so you can compare similar foods after reading the review.

Brand analysis

Royal Canin dog food analysis: veterinary diets, breed lines, and label checks

Royal Canin spans veterinary, breed, and daily lines, so product purpose matters first.

Heart criteria

Best dog food for heart disease: sodium, taurine, L-carnitine, omega-3, and DCM context

Heart context should connect sodium, taurine, L-carnitine, and omega-3 disclosure.

Allergy criteria

Best dog food for dogs with allergies: protein history, hydrolyzed diets, and label checks

Allergy context depends on protein history, hydrolyzed formulas, and limited ingredients.

Joint criteria

Best dog food for joint support: weight control, EPA/DHA, glucosamine, and mobility checks

Joint context should connect weight control, EPA+DHA, and disclosed support ingredients.

Label basics

Best dog food criteria: ingredients, calories, disclosure, and health context

Before the brand claim, compare top ingredients, guaranteed analysis, kcal/kg, and disclosure.